Technical Note

Journal of Humanimal Sciences. 30 June 2025. 77-83
https://doi.org/10.23341/jhas.2025.1.2.77

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • 1. Introduction

  • 2. Materials and Methods

  •   2.1. Soil Sampling and Analysis

  •   2.2. Statistical Analysis

  • 3. Results and Discussion

  •   3.1. Soil Chemical Properties

  •   3.2. Comparison of SOM by Analytical Method

  • 4. Conclusions

1. Introduction

Soil organic matter (SOM) is a central component of soil health, contributing to nutrient availability, pollutant immobilization, and improved soil physical properties such as aggregate stability and porosity [1, 2]. SOM also supports microbial diversity and activity in the soil ecosystem [3, 4]. Quantifying SOM is often achieved by converting soil organic carbon (SOC) values using correction factors, which range from 1.4 to 2.5 depending on soil type and depth [5]. In Korea, a conversion factor of 1.724 is commonly used, based on the assumption that SOC comprises 58% of SOM.

SOC can be determined through wet or dry oxidation methods. The Tyurin method, a wet oxidation technique using potassium dichromate and sulfuric acid, is prevalent in Korea due to its simplicity and high recovery rates. However, it poses environmental risks and may yield underestimates due to incomplete oxidation or interference from Cl⁻, Fe²⁺, and MnO₂ [5, 6, 7]. In contrast, dry combustion employs high-temperature oxidation and automated elemental analyzers, offering greater accuracy but at higher cost and operational complexity [8].

Previous studies have shown that the correlation between methods depends on soil properties. For example, Seo et al. [9] reported minimal differences in soils with low inorganic carbon, while Kim et al. [10] highlighted the importance of pretreatment in calcareous soils. This study evaluates and compares SOM contents derived from the Tyurin and dry combustion methods across three contrasting soil types: organic farming, calcareous, and reclaimed tidal soils.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soil Sampling and Analysis

A total of 58 surface soil samples (0–15 cm) were collected: 24 from organic upland farming fields, 25 from calcareous soils (9 paddy and 16 upland), and 9 from reclaimed tidal upland soils. Samples were collected using a soil auger, stored in polyethylene bags, air-dried for one week, and sieved to 2 mm before chemical analysis.

Soil organic matter (SOM) content was quantified using both the Tyurin method and dry combustion via a Vario MAX CN analyzer (Elementary, Germany). For the Tyurin method, samples were pretreated to remove inorganic carbon (1:4:2 soil:HCl:water, 4 h standing time). Additional soil properties were analyzed as listed in Table 1. Instrumental settings for dry combustion are provided in Table 2.

Table 1.

Chemical analysis methods and equipment used for determining soil chemical properties

Property Unit Method Instrument
pH (1:5) 1:5 H₂O Orion STAR A214, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA
SOM g kg⁻¹ Tyurin
SOM g kg⁻¹ Dry combustion Vario MAX CN, Elementar, Germany
Available P₂O₅ mg kg⁻¹ Lancaster’s method UV-1200PLUS, Hoverlabs, India
Ca²⁺, K⁺, Mg²⁺ cmolc kg⁻¹ 1N NH₄OAc extraction 5800 ICP-OES, Agilent, USA
CEC cmolc kg⁻¹ 1N NH₄OAc extraction 5800 ICP-OES, Agilent, USA
Table 2.

Settings for the dry combustion method used to determine organic carbon content in soils

Parameter Setting
Weighing sample 2 ± 0.2 g
Calibration sample Glutamic acid
Sample injection Autosampler
Gas pressure – He 3.8 bar
Gas pressure – O₂ 2.5 bar
Combustion temperature 900°C
Post-combustion temp. 900°C
Reduction temperature 830°C

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Regression analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to compare SOM values from both methods. A 5% significance level was used.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Soil Chemical Properties

The chemical properties of the three soil types varied considerably, reflecting differences in land management and parent material. Organic farmland soils exhibited a neutral to slightly alkaline pH (mean 7.0), high available phosphorus (Av. P₂O₅ = 560 mg kg⁻¹), and elevated CEC (17 cmolc kg⁻¹), likely due to continuous application of organic inputs. Organic amendments contribute to soil buffering capacity and cation availability by releasing base cations during decomposition [1, 2]. The high Av. P₂O₅ concentration suggests long-term accumulation from repeated applications of livestock manure compost [10].

Calcareous soils were characterized by a higher pH (mean 8.0), consistent with the presence of calcium carbonate (CaCO₃), which contributes to alkalinity and increases soil calcium and CEC [11, 12]. Av. P₂O₅ levels (315 mg kg⁻¹) were within the optimal range for upland crops, while CEC averaged 12 cmolc kg⁻¹. Despite moderate K⁺ and Mg²⁺ concentrations, the overall fertility status was sufficient for crop production.

Reclaimed tidal soils exhibited slightly alkaline conditions (pH 7.7), low Av. P₂O₅ (27 mg kg⁻¹), and low Ca²⁺ (1.2 cmolc kg⁻¹), but relatively high Mg²⁺ (2.7 cmolc kg⁻¹). These patterns are consistent with saline soil profiles, where marine-derived salts accumulate during reclamation processes [13, 14]. The low P availability and moderate CEC (8.1 cmolc kg⁻¹) suggest limited nutrient retention capacity. However, ongoing farming and soil remediation efforts can gradually improve these properties [15].

These trends and numerical values are summarized in Table 3, which provides a statistical overview of the chemical characteristics across the three soil types.

Table 3.

Statistics of the chemical characteristics across the three soil types

Soil Type Stat. pH Av. P₂O₅ Ca²⁺ K⁺ Mg²⁺ CEC
(1:5 H₂O) (mg kg⁻¹) (cmolc kg⁻¹)
Organic farming (n=24) Mean 7.0 560 9.3 0.82 2.5 17
SE 0.16 84 0.92 0.18 0.29 1.2
Min 4.9 49 1.4 0.07 0.40 8.1
Max 8.4 1463 18 3.3 5.9 31
CV (%) 11 73 48 110 57 33
Calcareous (n=25) Mean 8.0 315 12 0.63 2.2 12
SE 0.04 57 0.77 0.09 0.20 0.62
Min 7.7 4.0 0.90 0.10 0.40 5.9
Max 8.6 1000 18 2.00 4.3 16
CV (%) 2.5 90 31 75 45 27
Reclaimed tidal (n=9) Mean 7.7 27 1.2 0.59 2.7 8.1
SE 0.24 4.5 0.19 0.02 0.24 0.64
Min 6.7 10 0.40 0.47 1.3 4.5
Max 8.9 49 2.5 0.69 3.5 12
CV (%) 9.1 51 49 12 27 24
Optimum range Upland 6.0–7.0 300–500 5–6 0.5–0.8 1.5–2.0
Paddy 5.5–6.5 80–120 5–6 0.2–0.3 1.5–2.0

3.2. Comparison of SOM by Analytical Method

The SOM content determined by the Tyurin and dry combustion methods showed method- and soil-dependent variations (Table 4). In organic farming soils, both methods yielded comparable average SOM contents of 36 g kg⁻¹, though the dry combustion method slightly exceeded the Tyurin values across the range.

Table 4.

Statistical summary of soil organic matter (SOM) contents measured by the Tyurin and dry combustion methods

Soil Type Stat. Tyurin (g kg⁻¹) Dry Combustion (g kg⁻¹)
Organic farming (n=24) Mean 36 36
SE 3.4 3.8
Min 16 12
Max 77 80
CV (%) 46 52
Calcareous soils (n=25) Mean 26 49
SE 1.7 3.5
Min 14 24
Max 48 87
CV (%) 34 35
Reclaimed tidal soils (n=9) Mean 4.1 3.0
SE 0.5 0.4
Min 2.4 1.5
Max 6.0 5.3
CV (%) 34 38

Regression analysis (Fig. 1a) showed a strong linear relationship (Y = 0.9092X, R² = 0.88, p < 0.001). The consistency between methods suggests that in soils with low carbonate and chloride interference, the Tyurin method remains a viable alternative to dry combustion. However, incomplete oxidation of stable organic compounds in the Tyurin method may still contribute to slight underestimations [5].

In calcareous soils, the dry combustion method reported significantly higher SOM values (mean 49 g kg⁻¹) than the Tyurin method (mean 26 g kg⁻¹), with some values nearly doubling. The regression (Fig. 1b) yielded a moderate correlation (Y = 0.4585X, R² = 0.79), though not statistically significant. This discrepancy is likely due to the presence of unremoved carbonates, which decompose at high temperatures during combustion, releasing CO₂ and falsely inflating SOM estimates [7]. Additionally, acid pretreatment in the Tyurin method may not completely eliminate carbonate interference. Kim et al. [10] emphasized the importance of rigorous carbonate removal in calcareous soils to improve inter-method consistency.

In reclaimed tidal soils, the Tyurin method produced higher SOM values (mean 4.1 g kg⁻¹) than dry combustion (mean 3.0 g kg⁻¹). Regression analysis (Fig. 1c) showed a positive relationship (Y = 1.1871X, R² = 0.78), indicating that the Tyurin method may overestimate SOM in these soils. The likely cause is oxidation of chloride (Cl⁻) during the wet oxidation process, which can artificially elevate SOC estimates [16, 17]. Additionally, high salinity and uncertain pretreatment effectiveness may result in analytical variability [18]. Although acid treatment is commonly applied to remove inorganic carbon, it can also lead to organic matter losses, particularly of recalcitrant fractions. Park et al. [19] noted that in saline soils, the precision of dry combustion results depends heavily on the effectiveness of pretreatment protocols.

These findings highlight that while the Tyurin method is suitable for low-interference soils, it requires modification and caution when applied to carbonate- or salt-affected soils. Conversely, although dry combustion is more robust across varying soil types, it is not immune to overestimation risks and requires proper pretreatment to ensure accuracy.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jhas/2025-001-02/N0690010204/images/jhas_01_02_04_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Regression relationships between SOM content determined by dry combustion and the Tyurin method in (a) organic farming soils, (b) calcareous soils, and (c) reclaimed tidal soils.

4. Conclusions

SOM quantification varied by method and soil type. The Tyurin method produced reliable results in organic soils but was less accurate in calcareous and saline soils. Dry combustion, although more robust, also requires pretreatment to avoid overestimation. Tailoring analytical methods to soil properties is essential for accurate SOM measurement.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. RS-2022-RD010404)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1

Lehmann J, Kleber M. 2015. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528(7580):60-68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069

10.1038/nature1606926595271
2

Kim JG, Lee SS, Kim PJ. 2004. Effects of soil organic matter on physical properties in upland soils. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 37(5):271-277.

3

Schnecker J, Wild B, Takriti M, Alves RJE, Gentsch N, Gittel A, Hofer A, Klaus K, Knoltsch A, Lashchinskiy N, Mikutta R, Richter A. 2015. Microbial community composition shapes enzyme patterns in topsoil and subsoil horizons along a latitudinal transect in Western Siberia. Soil Biol Biochem 83:106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.016

10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.01625859057PMC4381299
4

Tang S, Ma Q, Marsden KA, Chadwick DR, Luo Y, Kuzyakov Y, Wu L, Jones DL. 2023. Microbial community succession in soil is mainly driven by carbon and nitrogen contents rather than phosphorus and sulphur contents. Soil Biol Biochem 180:109019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109019

10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109019
5

Pribyl, DW. 2010. A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor. Geoderma 156(3-4):75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.003

10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.003
6

Schulte EE, Hopkins BG. 1996. Estimation of soil organic matter by weight loss-on-ignition. In: Magdoff F, Tabatabai MA, Hanlon E, editors. Soil Organic Matter: Analysis and Interpretation. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America p. 21-31. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub46.c3

10.2136/sssaspecpub46.c324395490
7

Xiujun W, Wang J, Zhang J. 2012. Comparisons of three methods for organic and inorganic carbon in calcareous soils of northwestern China. PLOS One e44334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044334

10.1371/journal.pone.004433422952957PMC3432125
8

Konen ME, Jacobs PM, Burras CL, Talaga BJ, Mason JA. 2002. Equations for predicting soil organic carbon using loss-on-ignition for North Central U.S. soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66(6):1878-1881. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1878

10.2136/sssaj2002.1878
9

Seo JS, Lee YB, Lee CH. 2004. Comparison of carbon contents in soils with different properties by Tyurin and dry combustion methods. Korean J Environ Agric 23(4):338-344. (In Korean with English abstract)

10

Kim MS, Jeon SH, Lee TG, Jung HI, Kim CW, Kim YK. 2021. Comparison of wet oxidation and dry combustion methods for organic matter analysis of soils derived from granite, limestone, and volcanic ash. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 54(4):674-683. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.4.674

10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.4.674
11

Bolan NS, Adriano DC, Curtin D. 2003. Soil acidification and liming interactions with nutrient and heavy metal transformation and bioavailability. Advances in Agronomy 78:215-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(02)78006-1

10.1016/S0065-2113(02)78006-1
12

Ab Manan WNA, Ab Aziz NA. 2018. Optimization of soil pH by using calcium carbonate (CaCO3) obtained from seashell waste. Gading J Sci Technol 1(1):81-86.

13

Koo BJ, Kang H, Lee DS.1998. Soil salinity and reclamation in Korean tidal flats. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 31(4):284-289. (In Korean)

14

Yang JE, Ok YS, Kim WK, Kim SC. 2008. Soil properties and fertility in reclaimed saline lands of Korea. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 41(2):102-110. (In Korean)

15

Ryu JH, Lee YJ, Kim YK, Lee JJ. 2019. Improvement of soil fertility in reclaimed tidal soils through long-term farming. Korean J Environ Agric 38(4):289-295. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2019.38.4.40

10.5338/KJEA.2019.38.4.40
16

Walkley A. 1947. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci 63(4):251-263. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194704000-00001

10.1097/00010694-194704000-00001
17

Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2-Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): ASA and SSSA. p. 539-579. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29

10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29
18

Bisutti I, Hilke I, Raessler M. 2004. Determination of total organic carbon-an overview of current methods. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 23(10-11):716-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2004.09.003

10.1016/j.trac.2004.09.003
19

Park HJ, Choi JW, Lee SM. 2024. Evaluation of dry combustion and wet oxidation methods in saline soils for accurate SOM measurement. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 55(1):In press.

페이지 상단으로 이동하기