All Issue

2025 Vol.1, Issue 3

Research Article

Development of the new scoring system based on importance levels to improve the objectivity of HACCP evaluation of meat sales shop
Hyun-Ho Shin14
,
Seung-Hee Baek2
,
In-Sik Nam13*
1School of Animal Life Convergence Science, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea
2Research Center for Environment Friendly and Quality Livestock Production Technology, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea
3Institute of Applied Humanimal Science, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea
4Korea Agency of HACCP Accreditation and Service, Chungju 28160, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding Author
30 September 2025. pp. 93-101
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Currently, more than 700 meat sales shop are implementing the HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) system. The pre-requisite management program of HACCP evaluation standard in meat sales shop consists of 51 items. HACCP management program of HACCP evaluation standard in meat sales shop consists of 15 items. Therefore, the HACCP evaluation standard in meat sales shop consists of total 65 evaluation items. According to the recently revised HACCP evaluation standard of the meat sales store, the method of determining the results with the existing ‘○’, ‘△’, and ‘×’ was maximum 5 points for each item. A standard of judgment for evaluation standard are score 5 (good): without any mistake, consistent implementation of the field and record keeping according to the HACCP manual, score 3 (generally): some mistake but consistent implementation of the field and record keeping according to the HACCP manual, score 1 (inadequate): many mistakes and low implementation of the field and record keeping, and score 0 (executory): law violations, respectively. To assign a different score for each HACCP evaluation item, the severity of hazard and the rate of non-compliance in the past three years were analyzed. The results were as follows. Total score of pre-requisite management and HACCP management were changed to 180 score (pre-requisite management) and 100 score (HACCP management), respectively. If the results of this study are applied to HACCP inspection in the field of meat sales shop, it is expected that fair HACCP judgment will be possible by increasing the objectivity and rationality.

Keywords
Evaluation standard
HACCP
Meat sales shop
Rate of non-compliance
Severity of hazard
References
1

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2023. Food and livestock products safety management certification standard (Notification number 2023-26). Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, CheongJu, Korea.

2

Kim YS, Nam IS. 2017. A study on the score differentiation of HACCP evaluation items in meat packaging plant. Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medical 41:9-15. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.13041/jpvm.2017.41.1.13

10.13041/jpvm.2017.41.1.13
3

Kim JH, Hur SJ, Yim DG. 2018. Monitoring of microbial contaminants of beef, pork and chicken in HACCP implemented meat processing plants of Korea. Korean Journal of Food Science and Animal Resource 38:563-583. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.2.282

10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.2.28229805278PMC5960826
4

Cho SH, Baek SH, Ahn JH, Nam IS. 2019. A study on microbial management level of manufacturing environmental, raw meat and products in HACCP implemented meat market. Journal of Organic Agriculture 27:193-204. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2019.27.2.193

10.11625/KJOA.2019.27.2.193
5

Hong JH, Lee SM. 2011. Suggestions for a better HACCP system assessment in livestock product processing plants. Korean Journal of Veterinary Service 34:441-448. [in Korean]https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2011.34.4.441

10.7853/kjvs.2011.34.4.441
6

Hong JH, Kang CK. 2012. Suggestions for better HACCP system operation in butcher shop. Korean Journal of Veterinary Service 35:321-325. [in Korean]https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2012.35.4.321

10.7853/kjvs.2012.35.4.321
7

Nam IS. 2017. A study of importance and score setting of HACCP evaluation items on pig farm. Korean Journal Organic Agriculture 25:233-246. [in Korean] http://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2017.25.1.233

10.11625/KJOA.2017.25.1.233
8

United States Department of Agriculture. 2014. USDA good agricultural practices handling practices audit verification checklist. Washington, USA.

9

Hong JH. 2004. Development of evaluation method for HACCP system. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, CheongJu, Korea.

10

Nam IS. 2015. Establishment of evaluation criteria for determining compliance and noncompliance with livestock product HACCP evaluation items. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, CheongJu, Korea.

11

Ropkins K, Back AJ. 2000. Evaluation of worldwide approaches to the use of HACCP to control food safety. Trends in Food Science & Technology 11:10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00036-4.

10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00036-4
12

Ismail RM, Latiff FAA, Mustafar M. 2018. Malaysia food safety concern-bringing HACCP to the community. Journal of Social Sciences Research. Special Number 6:202-207.https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.202.207

10.32861/jssr.spi6.202.207
13

Yang Y, Wei I, Pei J. 2018. Application of meta-analysis technique to assess effectiveness of HACCP based FSM systems in Chinese SLDBs. Food Control 96:291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.09.013

10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.09.013
14

Dzwolak W. 2019. Assessment of HACCP plans in standardized food safety management system-the case of small-size Polish food businesses. Food Control 106:106716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106716

10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106716
15

Imami D, Zhllima E, Skreli E. 2020. Analyzing consumer awareness and perceptions about food safety in the context of a European transition country applying segmentation approach. Journal of Economic Agribusiness 13:14-28.

16

Mandal S, Singh AK, Singh B, Singh K, Singh S, Pandey VK. 2021. Study on safety and quality aspects in restaurants based on HACCP in Allahabad city. European Journal of Biotechnology and Bioscience 9:6-9.

17

Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2001. Codex Alimentarius: Food hygiene basic. 2nd ed. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Room.

18

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2022. Livestock products sanitary control Act. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, CheongJu, Korea.

Information
  • Publisher :Journal of Humanimal Sciences
  • Publisher(Ko) :한경국립대학교 휴머니멀응용과학연구소
  • Journal Title :Journal of Humanimal Sciences
  • Journal Title(Ko) :휴머니멀과학학술지
  • Volume : 1
  • No :3
  • Pages :93-101
  • Received Date : 2025-07-17
  • Accepted Date : 2025-08-18
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.23341/jhas.2025.1.3.93
Journal Informaiton Journal of Humanimal Sciences Journal of Humanimal Sciences
Online Submission
  • open access
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close